ArticleGut microbes2026
Article in Gut microbes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intratumoral microbiota in cancer immunotherapy: metabolic-epigenetic crosstalk and engineered bacterial therapeutics.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Effects of probiotics on joint homeostasis and osteoarthritis: Development of microbe-gut-cartilage axis-on-a-chip.Science advances · 2026Article
- Nasal Exposure to Environmental PM2.5 Drives Testicular Pyroptosis and Tissue Damage: Evidence from Inhibitor Intervention and Multi Source Data.Research square · 2026Article
- Oxidative Stress in Multiple Myeloma: Pathogenic Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Redox-Targeted Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Tryptophan-Restricted Intermittent Diet Alleviates Estrogen Deficiency-Induced Osteoporosis via Regulating Coupling Effects of "Gut-Bone" Axis.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence reveals a strong connection between the gut microbiota and cancer. However, the exact role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in multiple myeloma (MM) is poorly understood, and the therapeutic potential of microbiota-targeted interventions represents a promising strategy that demands urgent mechanistic and translational investigation. First, we conducted a comprehensive microbiome-metabolite analysis between MM patients and healthy individuals. The result revealed a marked compositional difference characterized by reduced abundances of butyrate-producing bacteria and diminished butyrate levels in the MM cohort. Subsequent fecal microbiota transplantation demonstrated that the gut microbiota critically modulates MM progression, with healthy donor-derived microbiota reducing the tumor burden and concomitantly elevating serum butyrate. Furthermore, through function-based culturomics screening,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.