ArticleBlood2026
A stem and progenitor cell-derived gene expression signature is prognostic for survival in myelofibrosis.
Article in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clonal Metamorphosis: Deconstructing MPN Evolution with Single-Cell and Spatial Multi-Omics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractIn this study, we hypothesized that transcriptomic features among disease-driving hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) could improve current paradigms for risk stratification in myelofibrosis (MF). Therefore, we performed bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of blood from 358 patients with MF, split into training and test cohorts. Single-cell RNA-seq data from Lin-CD34+ MF HSPCs were used to guide the development of a prognostic model trained on the bulk RNA-seq data. A NanoString assay was used to validate our final model in 2 independent cohorts of patients with MF. We identified a 24-gene weighted-sum expression score (MPN24) that was prognostic of overall survival (OS). In 2 independent cohorts of 170 and 100 patients with MF, MPN24-high scoring patients had worse 5-year OS compared with MPN24-low scoring patients (25.5% vs 86.9%, hazard ratio [HR] = 9.81, P = 4.0e-11 and 23.5% vs 75.9%, HR, 6.40, P = 1.8e-7, respectively). MPN24-high was also associated with clinical, mutation and karyotypic features known to confer adverse risk in MF. The MPN24 score retained independent prognostic significance in multivariable analysis incorporating these covariates and existing risk stratification models including Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), DIPSS plus, Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System (MIPSS70), and MIPSS70 plus version 2.0, adding significant prognostic value to these risk stratification models (P = 1.6e-5, 4.0e-6, 1.5e-6, and 5.4e-4, respectively). The MPN24 score was particularly useful in improving risk-stratification of DIPSS-intermediate, and MIPSS70-intermediate and high-risk patients. MPN24 is an HSPC-derived gene expression score that is associated with OS independent of clinical and genomic prognostic variables and improves risk stratification in MF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.