ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Balancing pragmatism, norms and power relations: a qualitative study among post-abortion intrauterine device users in central Uganda.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While almost half of all pregnancies in Uganda are unintended, the use of post-abortion intrauterine devices (IUDs) remains low. In this study, we explored how women in Uganda with current or recent post-abortion IUD use navigated socio-cultural factors, norms and power relations, and overcame challenges that often hinder contraceptive use in this context. Between January and August 2023, we conducted a qualitative study at four health facilities in central Uganda. The study included 24 in-depth interviews with women aged 19 years and above who had used an IUD following treatment for incomplete abortion (spontaneous or induced). The data were transcribed and coded in NVivo and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Respondents justified their IUD use through a combination of pragmatic reasoning, personal autonomy and economic considerations. The right to bodily integrity, alongside practical reflections on financial constraints, gender roles and societal expectations, emerged as important considerations. Compassionate post-abortion contraceptive counselling enhanced confidence in their decision and dispelled myths and misconceptions. Concealed IUD use enabled participants to pursue their reproductive goals, while evading influence from partners, peers, or social norms that discourage use. Our findings highlight the potential of post-abortion contraceptive counselling in supporting women's choices, and the role of concealed IUD use in realising reproductive goals. Integrating arguments around bodily autonomy in post-abortion contraceptive counselling and advocacy and supporting overt and covert use may be important strategies to strengthen sexual and reproductive health and rights in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.