Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481339›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

Considerations for Clinical Trial Design in Relapsed and Refractory Osteosarcoma: An FDA Symposium.

Kristin M Wessel, Katherine A Janeway, Lara E Davis, Nicole Drezner, Martha Donoghue, Lee J Helman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin M WesselCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0000-8776-1969
Katherine A JanewayHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-3594
Lara E DavisKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-6480-1611
Nicole DreznerCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-9823
Martha DonoghueCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-6399
Lee J HelmanThe Osteosarcoma Institute, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-4475

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents, with a peak incidence coinciding with the pubertal growth spurt. Metastatic disease occurs in approximately 10% to 20% of newly diagnosed patients, most commonly in the lung. Although 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with localized disease at diagnosis is approximately 70% after standard upfront treatment of multi-agent chemotherapy and surgical resection, patients with metastatic or recurrent disease have a 5-year OS of approximately 30% in the pediatric age group. Currently, there is no standard treatment or FDA-approved therapy for relapsed and refractory osteosarcoma. Progress in identifying promising new treatments has been limited by its complex disease biology and rarity, as well as unique challenges of clinical trial design, including unreliability of objective response rate as a predictor of drug activity. Given these challenges and the unmet need for new therapies, the FDA Oncology Center of Excellence hosted an educational symposium, "Current Challenges in Clinical Trial Design for Relapsed and Refractory Osteosarcoma," in May 2023. During this mini symposium, patient advocates, regulators from the FDA, and academic thought leaders in the field of pediatric sarcoma discussed challenges in clinical trial design and implementation. Achieving progress in relapsed and refractory osteosarcoma will require intentional collaboration among all stakeholders to identify trial designs that are acceptable to patients and will provide sufficient evidence of efficacy and safety to support a marketing application. Herein, we summarize the key points and future directions discussed at this meeting.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOsteosarcomaResearch DesignAdolescentChildDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID41481339
PMCPMC12958155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.