Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481327›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

Changes in Medication Use During Medicaid Continuous Enrollment and Unwinding.

Benjamin N Rome, Jihye Han, Adrianna McIntyre, Aaron S Kesselheim, Benjamin D Sommers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin N RomeProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jihye HanProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Adrianna McIntyreDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aaron S KesselheimProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin D SommersDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Medicaid enrollment increased because states suspended routine eligibility determinations. After this continuous enrollment provision ended in April 2023, millions of US individuals lost Medicaid coverage. Objective: To measure how the unwinding of Medicaid enrollment was associated with changes in patients' use of health services, such as prescription medications. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was carried out using interrupted time series analysis to compare changes in quarterly Medicaid enrollment and prescription medication use from 2018, quarter (Q) 1 through 2024, Q1. Data were analyzed from November 2024 to February 2025. Exposures: The onset of continuous enrollment provision (2020, Q2) and unwinding (2023, Q2). Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes were quarterly state Medicaid enrollment and estimated number of reimbursed prescriptions. Log-transformed linear regression models were used to compare changes in state enrollment and prescriptions after continuous enrollment and unwinding, overall and stratified by states with different net enrollment changes and policies to protect patients during unwinding. Subsets of medications for certain chronic conditions and formulations primarily used by children were analyzed. Results: In the quarter before the COVID-19 pandemic (2019, Q4), Medicaid enrollment was 71.4 million, and there were about 183.2 million prescriptions reimbursed by Medicaid programs. This included 59.1 million (32.3%) prescriptions treating chronic diseases, 30.3 million (16.5%) for acute conditions, and 15.0 million (8.2%) for other specified conditions. In 2023, Q2, enrollment peaked at 93.9 million (31.4% increase from baseline), and the number of prescriptions peaked at 212.6 million (16.1% increase from baseline). Enrollment increased by 2.42% (95% CI, 2.15%-2.70%) per quarter during continuous enrollment and decreased by 4.92% (95% CI, -6.12% to -3.70%) per quarter during unwinding. Concurrently, the number of prescriptions increased by 1.85% (95% CI, 1.21%-2.50%) per quarter and then decreased by 3.94% (95% CI, -5.73% to -2.11%) per quarter. Trends were similar for chronic disease medications and pediatric-specific formulations. States with the highest disenrollment during unwinding had the largest decreases in chronic disease medication use; states that implemented more protective policies had smaller decreases in enrollment and insignificant decreases in chronic medication use. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that changes in Medicaid medication use during the COVID-19 pandemic continuous enrollment period and after unwinding were smaller than corresponding changes in enrollment. Unwinding had measurable impacts on patient access to prescription medications, but states that implemented protective policies were able to mitigate these changes.

Indexed as

COVID-19MedicaidPrescription DrugsChildCross-Sectional StudiesEligibility DeterminationHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisSARS-CoV-2United StatesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID41481327
PMCPMC12761332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.