ArticleJAMA health forum2026
Tertiary Patents on Drugs Approved by the FDA.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmaceutical products with device-only patents: a cross-sectional analysis.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Manufacturers of drug-device combinations, such as inhalers and injectable medications, often obtain patents not just on the active pharmaceutical ingredients of these products (primary patents) but also on other features, such as their formulations and methods of use (secondary patents) and delivery devices (tertiary patents). Courts, policymakers, and regulators have recently begun scrutinizing whether manufacturers may be improperly listing tertiary patents with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that lack claims on active pharmaceutical ingredients and whether such patents may be delaying generic competition. However, the full scope of patenting practices on drug-device combinations remains unknown. Objective: To analyze patent protection on small-molecule drugs approved by the FDA from 1986 to 2023 with 1 or more tertiary patents. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study of patenting practices on drug-device combinations, all patents listed in the FDA's Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book) were categorized (primary, secondary, or tertiary), and products with at least 1 tertiary patent were included. Analyses were performed between May 2024 and October 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of the study was the duration of expected patent protection on each product, measured from the time of approval until expiration of the last-to-expire patent. Added protection from tertiary patents that went beyond protection afforded by primary or secondary patents was also analyzed. Results: The FDA approved 331 products from 1986 to 2023 with 1 or more tertiary patents; 137 of 3241 patents (4.2%) listed on these products were primary patents, 1353 of 3241 were secondary patents (41.7%), and 1751 of 3241 were tertiary patents (54.0%). Among tertiary patents, 1047 of 1751 (59.8%) lacked claims making any mention of active pharmaceutical ingredients. The median (IQR) duration of expected patent protection among products in the cohort was 17.6 (14.4-21.2) years. There were 180 products (54.4%) that had tertiary patents extending periods of expected protection beyond other patents, and the median (IQR) duration of added protection was 7.5 (2.8-13.9) years. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that policymakers and regulators should take steps to ensure that tertiary patents are not improperly listed in the Orange Book and that generic competition occurs in a timely fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.