ArticleHealth physics2026
GSI-ESA-NASA Nuclear Cross-section Database: Update II. Elemental and Isotopic Fragment-production Cross Sections.
Article in Health physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimentally measured nuclear fragment-production cross-sections are needed for the development of cross-section models implemented in the radiation transport codes used for several endpoints, including radiation protection and health risk assessment in space. Elemental and isotopic fragment-production cross-section data have been collected from literature in a publicly available database through a combined GSI-ESA-NASA effort. The collected data for systems of interest for space exploration are discussed, and the literature gaps are indicated. The data are also compared with the nuclear fragmentation models implemented in the NASA radiation transport code HZETRN2020, namely NUCFRG3 and RAADFRG. The results show that NUCFRG3 does not take into account nuclear-structure effects, while RAADFRG does. Therefore, RAADFRG can estimate more precisely the production of certain projectile fragments, in particular helium. Nevertheless, for some systems and high energies, RAADFRG overestimates the oscillations due to odd-even effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.