ReviewHealth physics2026
Revisiting Tolerability and Reasonableness in the System of Radiological Protection.
Review in Health physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concepts of risk tolerability and the search for reasonableness are central to the implementation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) system of radiological protection. For a given exposure situation, it is necessary to ask whether the doses received (or potentially received) by those exposed can be considered tolerable with regard to the radiation-induced risk (consistent with the principle of application of dose limits). In addition, it should be assessed whether all exposures are maintained or reduced as low as reasonably achievable taking into account economic, societal, and environmental factors (consistent with the principle of optimization of protection). Relying on the ethical foundations of the ICRP system (i.e., Publication 138), ICRP Task Group 114 (TG114) is engaged in a critical reflection on the history, definitions, roles, scope, and application of "tolerability" and "reasonableness" in the context of radiological protection. In developing and articulating a revised framework for tolerability and reasonableness, focusing on the achieved level of protection and the concept of well-being, consideration has been given to application of this framework in different contexts. This paper provides a brief overview of the motivation and current work of TG114 and highlights key points for the application of the proposed revised framework in three contexts: i.e., medicine, emergency and recovery after a nuclear accident, and the nuclear sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.