Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41481183›Full record

ReviewHealth physics2026

Revisiting Tolerability and Reasonableness in the System of Radiological Protection.

Thierry Schneider, Nicole Martinez, Sébastien Baechler, Toshimitsu Homma, Bernard Le Guen, Yann Billarand, Eduardo Gallego, Carl-Magnus Larsson, Jean-François Lecomte, Reinhard Loose and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thierry SchneiderNuclear Protection Evaluation Centre (CEPN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; thierry.schneider@cepn.asso.fr.
Nicole MartinezClemson University, Clemson, USA.
Sébastien BaechlerFederal Office of Public Health, Bern, Switzerland.
Toshimitsu HommaNuclear Regulation Authority (NRA), Tokyo, Japan.
Bernard Le GuenInternational Radiological Protection Association (IRPA), Saint-Denis, France.
Yann BillarandNuclear Safety and Radiological Protection Authority (ASNR), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Eduardo GallegoUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Carl-Magnus LarssonNorwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), Oslo, Norway.
Jean-François LecomteInternational Commission on Radiological Protection.
Reinhard LooseParacelsus Medical University, Institute of Medical Physics, Hospital Nuremberg, Germany.
Haruyuki OginoNuclear Regulation Authority (NRA), Tokyo, Japan.
Werner RühmFederal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Neuherberg, Germany.
Momo TakadaNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji TsuchidaKansai University, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concepts of risk tolerability and the search for reasonableness are central to the implementation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) system of radiological protection. For a given exposure situation, it is necessary to ask whether the doses received (or potentially received) by those exposed can be considered tolerable with regard to the radiation-induced risk (consistent with the principle of application of dose limits). In addition, it should be assessed whether all exposures are maintained or reduced as low as reasonably achievable taking into account economic, societal, and environmental factors (consistent with the principle of optimization of protection). Relying on the ethical foundations of the ICRP system (i.e., Publication 138), ICRP Task Group 114 (TG114) is engaged in a critical reflection on the history, definitions, roles, scope, and application of "tolerability" and "reasonableness" in the context of radiological protection. In developing and articulating a revised framework for tolerability and reasonableness, focusing on the achieved level of protection and the concept of well-being, consideration has been given to application of this framework in different contexts. This paper provides a brief overview of the motivation and current work of TG114 and highlights key points for the application of the proposed revised framework in three contexts: i.e., medicine, emergency and recovery after a nuclear accident, and the nuclear sector.

Indexed as

Radiation ExposureRadiation InjuriesRadiation ProtectionHumansInternational AgenciesRadiation DosageRisk Assessmentas low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)ethicsoptimizationradiation protection

Identifiers

PMID41481183
PMCPMC12736415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.