Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41480974›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2026

Associations between attitudes accepting of wife abuse and emotional abuse, forced heavy work, and food deprivation during pregnancy in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

Pratibha Manandhar, Pratibha Chalise, Poonam Rishal, Kunta Devi Pun, Jacquelyn Campbell, Lena Henriksen, Sunil Kumar Joshi, Mirjam Lukasse, Berit Schei, Jennifer Jean Infanti and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pratibha ManandharFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2071-1347
Pratibha ChaliseFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0009-0004-3517-0373
Poonam RishalFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-757X
Kunta Devi PunDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences (KUSMS), Dhulikhel, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-7395
Jacquelyn CampbellSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3821-5037
Lena HenriksenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4297-1732
Sunil Kumar JoshiDepartment of Community Medicine, Kathmandu Medical College Public Limited (KMC), Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2704-5060
Mirjam LukasseFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Center for Women's, Family and Child Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9873-4023
Berit ScheiFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7646-4985
Jennifer Jean InfantiFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8772-026X
Katarina SwahnbergFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5200-1740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial norms and gendered power relationships contribute to the acceptability of 'wife abuse' - a common form of domestic violence globally.

objectivesTo estimate the prevalence and overlap of emotional abuse, forced heavy work, and food deprivation during pregnancy and examine their association with women's attitudes accepting of wife abuse in Nepal.

methodsBaseline data were used from a randomized controlled trial involving pregnant women aged 18 and older attending routine antenatal care at two public hospitals in Nepal between January 2023 and March 2025. Participants completed a color-coded audio computer assisted self-interview. Attitudes toward wife abuse were assessed using 16 items drawn from three existing instruments. Exploratory factor analysis identified three distinct attitudinal factors. The dependent variable was a composite indicator of emotional abuse, forced heavy work, or food deprivation (coded as present if any were reported). Associations between the three attitudinal factors and composite outcome were analyzed using multiple logistic regression, adjusting for relevant sociodemographic variables.

resultsEmotional abuse, forced heavy work, or food deprivation was reported by 6.7% of participants. Acceptance of wife abuse for domestic shortcomings (Factor 1) was significantly associated with higher odds of experiencing abuse (aOR [1.75 (1.23-2.50)].

conclusionsPregnant women who endorsed attitudes accepting wife abuse - particularly for perceived domestic shortcomings - had higher odds of experiencing emotional abuse, forced heavy work, or food deprivation. These findings highlight importance of addressing harmful gender norms within households and ensuring antenatal care settings include safe opportunities to identify and support women at risk.

Indexed as

AttitudeEmotional AbusePregnant PeopleSpouse AbuseAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNepalPregnancyYoung Adultfamily violencegender normsin-law perpetrationintimate partner violencelow- and middle-income country

Identifiers

PMID41480974
PMCPMC12777793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.