SynthesisWomen's health (London, England)
The lived experiences and coping mechanisms of women with obstetric fistula in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.
Synthesis in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstetric fistula, a preventable consequence of prolonged obstructed labor, inflicts profound physical, psychological, and social suffering, leaving many women described as "living dead." In Ethiopia, where the burden remains high, little is known about women lived experiences and coping strategies beyond clinical outcomes. This review was conducted to synthesize qualitative evidence, illuminate these challenges, and inform holistic interventions.
objectivesTo synthesize available evidence on the lived experiences and coping mechanisms of women with obstetric fistula in Ethiopia.
designThis study employed a qualitative meta-synthesis approach. DATA SOURCES AND
methodsThis review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review and meta-synthesis methodological guidance and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. ATLAS.ti software, Version 25, Lumivero was used for analysis. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases up to May 25, 2025, including both published and unpublished studies examining the lived experiences of women with obstetric fistula. All eligible studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program to ensure methodological rigor. Data were systematically extracted and analyzed using thematic synthesis, and the results are presented through tables, narrative summaries, and illustrative diagrams, providing a coherent and evidence-based synthesis of women's experiences and coping mechanisms.
resultsEight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing the diverse experiences of women with obstetric fistula in Ethiopia. Four major themes were developed: physical challenges such as pain, foot drop, odor, and urinary incontinence; psychological challenges including hopelessness, grief, and suicidal ideation; socioeconomic challenges like stigma, isolation, divorce, loneliness, social disintegration, and economic difficulties; and coping mechanisms such as self-isolation and wearing multiple layers of clothing.
conclusionWomen with obstetric fistula face intersecting physical, psychological, and socioeconomic burdens that erode dignity and social participation. Coping strategies such as self-isolation and layering clothes, while adaptive, often reinforce stigma and exclusion. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive interventions that go beyond surgical repair to include psychosocial support, stigma reduction, and economic reintegration programs. REGISTRATION: Registered with PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251064015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.