ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Femoral neck system with an additional cannulated screw for the treatment of elderly femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of the femoral neck system (FNS) alone versus FNS combined with an additional cannulated compression screw (CCS) for treating elderly patients (aged 65-75) with Garden I-III femoral neck fractures. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 126 patients treated between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients were divided into an FNS group (n = 60) and an FNS+CCS group (n = 66). Key outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, complications, VAS pain scores, and Harris hip scores at final follow-up. Results: The two groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics. While intraoperative blood loss was comparable, the FNS+CCS group had significantly longer operative times and required more fluoroscopies. All patients were followed for an average of 14.1 months. The FNS+CCS group demonstrated a significantly shorter fracture healing time and a lower incidence of femoral neck shortening at final follow-up. Although VAS scores were similar between groups, the FNS+CCS group achieved significantly higher Harris hip scores. The incidence of complications did not differ significantly. Conclusion: For elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, FNS fixation augmented with a CCS offers significant advantages over FNS alone, including accelerated fracture healing and superior functional recovery of the hip joint, despite a longer operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.