ReviewSleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Sleep and chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review of postoperative data.
Review in Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with nasal obstruction due to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis may present with altered sleep quality. Data on this subject in the literature remains scarce. Objectives: To evaluate changes in sleep quality and polysomnographic parameters among patients who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed in three databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. The following keywords were used: chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, sleep quality, and nasosinusal endoscopic surgery. Studies evaluating adults with nasal polyposis who underwent endoscopic nasosinusal surgery were selected. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare mean scores for polysomnographic and subjective variables from before to after the operation. Results: A systematic review and meta-analysis of three studies were performed, only one of which was randomized. The total sample consisted of 64 patients. There was a decrease in the mean AHI score and improvements in mean and minimum saturation. The mean difference in percentage of stage N3 from before to after the operation was 1.12 with a 95% CI from -3.51 to 5.75, which was non-significant. There was a mean percentage increase in REM sleep duration and a decrease in PSQI scores, which were both statistically significant ( Conclusion: There were improvements in the quality of sleep and duration of REM sleep after surgery, with no improvement in polysomnographic respiratory parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.