Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41480528›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Comparative analysis of clinical feature-based machine learning models for predicting myofascial pelvic pain syndrome: a single-center retrospective study.

Zhuyin Li, Wenjing Li, Jie Huang, Shuangyu Zhang, Ruolin Jia, Dongxia Liu, Yanhua Dong, Hongguo Zhao, Manman Nai, Lei Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhuyin LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenjing LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jie HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuangyu ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ruolin JiaPrenatal Diagnosis Center, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Dongxia LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yanhua DongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hongguo ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Manman NaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hang YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Myofascial pelvic pain syndrome (MPPS) is a common but often underdiagnosed cause of chronic pelvic pain in women, significantly affecting quality of life. Early and accurate identification of patients at risk is essential for improving treatment outcomes and reducing the clinical burden. Objective: This study aimed to develop an effective machine learning-based prediction model for MPPS among Chinese women to assist in early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Methods: A total of 1,136 women diagnosed with MPPS and 1,448 healthy women who underwent pelvic floor screening during the same period were included, yielding 2,584 samples. Six machine learning algorithms-logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost)-were trained using 5-fold cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was evaluated using the confusion matrix, precision, recall, F1 score, overall accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The accuracies of the six models were 0.77, 0.80, 0.91, 0.89, 0.88, and 0.81, respectively. The average area under the ROC curves (AUCs) were 0.670, 0.672, 0.956, 0.951, 0.952, and 0.836, respectively. Among the models, RF achieved the best performance for predicting MPPS, while XGBoost and LightGBM performed slightly lower, with all three models having AUCs above 0.95. Conclusion: Machine learning models, particularly the random forest algorithm, demonstrated strong potential for accurately predicting MPPS, supporting early diagnosis and enabling personalized clinical decision-making for women affected by this condition.

Indexed as

machine learningmodified Oxford muscle strength classificationmyofascial pelvic pain syndrome (MPPS)pelvic floor pressure assessmentpredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41480528
PMCPMC12754902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.