ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025
Comparison of two fixation techniques of olecranon osteotomy after reconstruction of intra-articular distal humerus fractures.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate surgical fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures require olecranon osteotomy. Repair of osteotomy is achieved with a variety of techniques but no consensus has been achieved regarding the optimum technique for fixing the olecranon osteotomy. In this retrospective study, we compared the functional and radiological outcome of the two commonly used techniques of fixing olecranon osteotomy after fixing distal humerus intra-articular fractures. We hypothesized that olecranon osteotomy fixed with 6.5 mm cancellous intramedullary screw alone yielded better radiological and functional outcome than fixation with cerclage wire over cancellous screw applied in figure of eight as tension band wiring (TBW).
aimTo determine the radiological and functional outcome of olecranon osteotomy fixation with cancellous screw alone
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted in Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar Pakistan. Intra-articular distal humerus fractures fulfilling the inclusion criteria and operated during 2023 to 2025 were included. Olecranon osteotomy fixation with 6.5 mm cancellous screw alone was labelled as group A while cerclage wire over cancellous screw in figure of eight as TBW were labelled as group B. The demographics, radiological and functional outcome in both groups were compared at one year using Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score.
resultsWe included 32 patients in this study. The mean age of group A patients was 34 ± 5.5 years while group B had a mean age of 34 ± 6.2 years. Radiological union of olecranon osteotomy was achieved in all cases in both groups. Functional outcome however was significantly better in group A than in group B (
conclusionSimilar radiological union was achieved in all patients of olecranon osteotomy treated with intramedullary screw alone and intramedullary screw with TBW. Functional outcome however was significantly better in intramedullary screw alone than in intramedullary screw with TBW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.