ReviewCureus2025
Clinical Manifestations and Management of Prurigo in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A particular type of dermatosis known as prurigo of pregnancy (PP) is typified by highly itchy papulonodules that primarily affect the extremities' extensor surfaces and the hand and feet dorsum. Despite PP not being a rare illness, there is surprisingly a distinct lack of studies exploring its depth. Therefore, this study seeks to thoroughly describe the clinical manifestation and treatment of pregnancy-related prurigo. Additionally, it aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of the effectiveness of different approaches to pregnancy prurigo therapy. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The systematic review searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from the databases' establishment to 13 August 2024. The studies were deemed included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case-control, cross-sectional, case series, and case reports; if they reported clinical manifestations and treatment for PP; and if they were written in the English language. Studies were excluded if they did not meet the aforementioned inclusion criteria; moreover, they were excluded if they were of high risk of bias or low quality. The articles included were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and methodological quality, and the synthesis of non-randomized studies. Four different studies, with a total of 63 patients, were included in our article. The typical rash of PP is described in most patients with variable onset and distribution on the body, from the extremities to the back to the buttocks. PP can be associated with a variety of conditions, including a history of other skin conditions, such as intrahepatic cholestasis and other medical conditions. Different treatments for PP in pregnant women were reported across the included studies, most commonly a combination of topical steroids, emollients, oral antihistamines, oral corticosteroids, and ultraviolet narrow band (UVB). The effectiveness of the various therapies is variable; some patients recover before delivery, while others recover months postpartum. This systematic review emphasizes how complicated PP is in terms of both its clinical manifestations, associations, and management. The evidence points to the urgent need for a more uniform approach to diagnosis and management due to substantial variability in the clinical features, onset, and treatment responses. The study emphasizes the need for additional, larger-scale research using standardized outcome measures to identify characteristics that predict treatment success and allow for more robust comparisons of treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.