Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41480437›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Conceptualization of Risk Stratification Using Large Language Models to Predict Severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia.

Adebanke Adeyemi, Swapan Nath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adebanke AdeyemiCollege of Medicine, Anne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, USA.
Swapan NathMedical Education and Clinical Microbiology, Anne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Large language models (LLMs), such as OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o3 and GPT-5 (Deep Research, Deep Thinking), have emerged as tools with reasonable efficacy in multiple domains of healthcare to enhance literature synthesis, support reasoning, and guide diagnostic and management framework development. In clinical domains, LLMs have been evaluated for readability, accuracy, and decision support, but their role in health professions education scholarship is still emerging.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence and educationchatgptclinical reasoning skillshealth-professions educationlarge language modelsnecrotizing pneumoniapredictive markers for severity

Identifiers

PMID41480437
PMCPMC12755411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.