ArticleCureus2025
Assessing Awareness, Knowledge, Perceptions, and Safety Practices Among Patients Regarding MRI Scans in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive radiological technique that generates detailed three-dimensional images of the body. While it offers advanced diagnostic capabilities, MRI poses potential risks, such as interactions with static magnetic fields and radiofrequency exposure, particularly when safety guidelines are not properly followed or outdated information is used.
methodsThe study utilized a cross-sectional research design to assess patients' awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and safety regarding MRI scans in the Qassim region. A total of 412 participants were involved, and data were collected online through social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Twitter, and Telegram. The data was then analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) to gain key insights.
resultsMore than half of the participants (238, 57.8%) believed they were knowledgeable about MRI risks and safety requirements. The study further revealed that less than half (181, 43.9%) of the participants had received information about MRI risks and the necessary safety precautions for the examination, while 231 (56.1%) had not. Among those who received information, the most common source was the internet (100, 55.2%). Additionally, most participants were informed that clothes (289, 70.1%), paper (237, 57.5%), and plastic buttons (240, 58.3%) are safe items during MRI examinations. The socio-demographic variables, namely gender, age, education level, and employment status, did not show a statistically significant difference in relation to knowledge about MRI (p-value > 0.05).
conclusionThe study found that while over half of participants felt informed about MRI risks and safety, there are still significant knowledge gaps. Most who had undergone an MRI felt their experiences increased their understanding. Demographic factors did not significantly affect knowledge levels. The findings suggest the need for targeted educational interventions, with online platforms and social media being effective tools for reaching a broader audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.