ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with hematological neoplasms.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with concurrent coronary artery disease (CAD) and hematological neoplasms presents unique challenges due to immunosuppression, hematologic dysfunction, and coagulopathy. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of CABG in this population and to evaluate factors influencing prognosis. Methods: This retrospective study included 41 patients with CAD and hematological neoplasms who underwent CABG between 2018 and 2023. Hematological neoplasms were classified into seven categories, and patients were stratified by hematological disease status: stable, disease-free, or progressive. Key perioperative outcomes, graft patency, and survival data were analyzed. Cox regression models identified independent predictors of prognosis. Results: Of the 41 patients, 28 (68.3%) were stable, 10 (24.4%) were disease-free, and 3 (7.3%) were progressive. The median preoperative platelet count was 143 × 10 Conclusions: CABG can be performed safely in most patients with stable hematological neoplasms, with no perioperative mortality, providing an opportunity for further hematological treatments. Preoperative blood cell levels significantly influence prognosis, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary management. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and refine treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.