ArticleWorld journal of stem cells2025
Impact of differentiation protocols on the functionality of mesenchymal stem cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells.
Article in World journal of stem cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equine mesenchymal stromal cells dual-primed with TGF-β1 and IL-1β or TNF-α improve epithelial healing.Research square · 2026Article
- Bioinspired artificial nanovesicles engineered from 3D spheroid-cultured UC-MSCs enhance angiogenic activityFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Decoding induced mesenchymal stem cells functionality: why differentiation protocols matter.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells revolutionized regenerative medicine, providing a source for generating induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells (iMSCs).
aimTo evaluate and compare five iMSC differentiation protocols, assessing their efficiency, phenotypic characteristics, and functional properties relative to primary mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).
methodsFive iMSC differentiation protocols were assessed: SB431542-based differentiation (iMSC1, iMSC3), an iMatrix-free method (iMSC2), growth factor supplementation (iMSC4), and embryoid body formation with retinoic acid (EB-iMSC). iMSC identity was confirmed according to the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy 2006 criteria, requiring expression of surface markers (CD105, CD73, CD90) and absence of pluripotency markers. Functional assays were conducted to evaluate differentiation potential (osteogenic and adipogenic), proliferation, mitochondrial function, reactive oxygen species, senescence, and migration.
resultsAll iMSC types expressed MSC markers and lacked pluripotency markers. EB-iMSC and iMSC2 showed enhanced osteogenesis (runt-related transcription factor 2;
conclusionWhile all protocols generated functional iMSCs, variations in differentiation, proliferation, and function emphasize the impact of protocol selection. These findings contribute to optimizing iMSC generation for research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.