ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Rapid health technology assessment of six non-ergot dopamine-receptor agonists for the treatment of early Parkinson's disease.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health technology assessment of long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the treatment of renal anemia in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Six non-ergot dopamine -receptor agonists (NEDAs), including pramipexole extended-release (ER), pramipexole immediate-release (IR), rotigotine patch, piribedil, ropinirole prolonged-release (PR), and ropinirole IR, are frequently used to treat early Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there is a paucity of comparative information about them. For making rational drug selections, six NEDAs were evaluated using a rapid health technology assessment method. Methods: According to the rapid guidelines for drug evaluation and selection in Chinese medical institutions (the Second Edition), the pharmacological properties, efficacy, safety, economy, and other attributes of six NEDAs were scored on a percentage system. Results: The composite scores of the six NEDAs are presented as follows: 74.99 points for pramipexole ER, 74.90 points for piribedil, 72.40 points for pramipexole IR, 70.78 points for rotigotine patch, 69.06 points for ropinirole PR and 68.41 points for ropinirole IR. Conclusion: Based on our comprehensive multi-criteria assessment, pramipexole ER, pramipexole IR, rotigotine patch, and piribedil are strongly recommended for inclusion in the formularies of medical institutions as therapeutic options for patients with early PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.