ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors during white-light endoscopy.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumor count and risk of lymph node metastasis in multiple rectal neuroendocrine tumors: an individual-level pooled analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to their significantly lower incidence than colorectal polyps and macroscopic features resembling those of hyperplastic polyps, rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNETs) are frequently misdiagnosed and resected as polyps. To date, no reports have been written on the application of artificial intelligence for assisting in the white-light endoscopy of rNETs.
aimTo establish a neuroendocrine tumor lesion detection algorithm based on the YOLOv7 model and evaluate the performance of the algorithm in identifying neuroendocrine tumors.
methodsIn total, 137748 white-light endoscopic images were collected in this study, including 2232 images of rNET, 4429 images of submucosal lesions other than rNET, 42563 images of polyps, and 88593 images of normal mucosa. All the images were randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and a test set. To evaluate the ability of the algorithm to diagnose rNETs, we selected 1578 images to form the test set. The performance of the algorithm was compared with that of endoscopists at different levels.
resultsThe accuracy of the algorithm in identifying rNET from all the images was 97.8%, the sensitivity was 72.6%, the specificity was 99.7%, the positive predictive value was 93.9%, and the negative predictive value was 98.1%.
conclusionOur model, which was based on YOLOv7, could effectively detect rNET lesions, which was better than that of most endoscopists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.