ArticleWorld journal of radiology2025
Interpretable model based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting the pathological grades of hepatocellular carcinomas.
Article in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable radiomics model based on magnetic resonance imaging to predict responses to transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the promising prospects of using artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) for disease classification and prediction purposes, the complexity and lack of explainability of this method make it difficult to apply the constructed models in clinical practice. We developed and validated an interpretable ML model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics and clinical features for the preoperative prediction of the pathological grades of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). This model will help clinicians better understand the situation and develop personalized treatment plans.
aimTo develop and validate an interpretable ML model for preoperative pathological grade prediction in HCC patients
methodsMRI and clinical data derived from 125 patients with HCCs confirmed by postoperative pathological examinations were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly split into training and validation groups (7:3 ratio). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent clinical predictors. The tumor lesions observed on axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI), arterial phase (AP), and portal venous phase (PVP) images were delineated in a slice-by-slice manner using 3D-slicer to generate volumetric regions of interest, and radiomic features were extracted. Interclass correlation coefficients were calculated, and least absolute selection and shrinkage operator regression were conducted for feature selection purposes. Six predictive models were subsequently developed for pathological grade prediction: FS-T2WI, AP, PVP, integrated radiomics, clinical, and combined radiomics-clinical (RC) models. The effectiveness of these models was assessed by calculating their area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values. The clinical applicability of the models was evaluated
resultsAmong the 125 patients, 87 were assigned to the training group, and 38 were assigned to the validation group. The maximum tumor diameter, hepatitis B virus status, and monocyte count were identified as independent predictors of pathological grade. Twelve optimal radiomic features were ultimately selected. The AUC values obtained for the FS-T2WI model, AP model, PVP model, radiomics model, clinical model, and combined RC model in the training group were 0.761 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.562-0.857], 0.870 (95%CI: 0.714-0.918), 0.868 (95%CI: 0.714-0.959), 0.917(95%CI: 0.857-0.959), 0.869 (95%CI: 0.643-0.973), and 0.941 (95%CI: 0.857-0.945), respectively; in the validation group, the AUC values were 0.724 (95%CI: 0.625-0.833), 0.802 (95%CI: 0.686-1.000), 0.797 (95%CI: 0.688-1.000), 0.901(95%CI: 0.833-0.906), 0.865 (95%CI: 0.594-1.000), and 0.932 (95%CI: 0.812-1.000), respectively. The combined RC model demonstrated the best performance. Additionally, the decision curve analysis revealed that the combined RC model had satisfactory prediction efficiency, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations value analysis revealed that the "FS-T2WI-wavelet-HLL_gldm_Large Dependence High Gray Level Emphasis" feature contributed the most to the model, exhibiting a positive effect.
conclusionAn interpretable ML model based on MRI radiomics provides a noninvasive tool for predicting the pathological grade of HCCs, which will help clinicians develop personalized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.