ReviewWorld journal of radiology2025
Developmental venous anomalies and cerebral cavernous malformations: Partners in crime.
Review in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are benign congenital veins that collect normal brain drainage into a single outlet. Cerebral cavernous malformations (CMs) are clusters of thin-walled capillary cavities prone to bleeding. When both lesions coexist, the DVA's altered venous pressure and flow can promote CM formation or rupture. Detecting a DVA abutting an otherwise unexplained intracerebral hemorrhage can therefore raise suspicion of an occult CM as a likely cause, a clue which may be invaluable for daily clinical practice. The main focus of this review is to acknowledge the hallmark imaging appearances of DVAs and CMs, as well as their coexistence, explore the clinical consequences of mixed lesions, and emphasize that recognizing their partnership is vital for an accurate, timely diagnosis and appropriately targeted management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.