ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Autonomous cyber-physical security middleware for IoT: anomaly detection and adaptive response in hybrid environments.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in cyber-physical systems introduces significant security challenges, particularly in distributed and heterogeneous environments where operational resilience and real-time threat response are critical. Previous efforts have explored lightweight encryption and modular authentication. Still, few solutions provide a unified framework that integrates real-time anomaly detection, automated mitigation, and performance evaluation under hybrid experimental conditions. This work presents an autonomous multi-layered security architecture for IoT networks, implemented through microservices-based middleware with native support for detection and adaptive response mechanisms. The architecture integrates lightweight anomaly inference models, based on entropy metrics and anomaly scores, with a rule-based engine that executes dynamic containment actions such as node isolation, channel reconfiguration, and key rotation. The system runs on edge hardware (Raspberry Pi, sensors, actuators) and is validated in a hybrid testbed with NS-3 simulations. Experimental results show an F1-Score of 0.931 in physical deployments and 0.912 in simulated scenarios, with anomaly detection latencies below 130 ms and containment actions triggered within 300 ms. Under high-load conditions, CPU usage remains under 60 % and memory consumption below 300 MB. Compared to representative middleware platforms such as BlendSM-DDM and Claimsware, the proposed system uniquely integrates detection, response, and auditability, achieving high scalability and resilience for IoT deployments in real-world hybrid environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.