ArticleJournal of health economics and outcomes research2025
Comparison of Prostate-Specific Antigen Response in Black Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Initiated on Apalutamide vs Abiraterone Acetate.
Article in Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Improved clinical outcomes have been observed in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) who experience deep prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses after treatment with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). Objective: This retrospective longitudinal study aimed to compare real-world PSA90 response (≥90% reduction from pretreatment levels) in Black patients with mCSPC treated with apalutamide vs abiraterone acetate. Methods: Electronic medical record (EMR) data from Precision Point Specialty Analytics were linked to claims data from the Komodo Research Database. Black adult patients with mCSPC who initiated apalutamide or abiraterone acetate on or after 9/17/2019 were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance patient characteristics between treatment cohorts. PSA90 was evaluated during the on-treatment period, defined as the time from index date to the earliest of treatment discontinuation, initiation of a new ARPI or radiopharmaceutical, or end of insurance claims activity or clinical activity. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios (HRs) were used to compare PSA90 responses between treatment cohorts. Results: This study included 363 patients, of which 236 initiated apalutamide and 127 initiated abiraterone acetate. At 6 months following treatment initiation, a greater proportion of patients treated with apalutamide (65.4%) vs abiraterone acetate (49.0%) achieved a PSA90 response. Patients who initiated apalutamide vs abiraterone acetate were 66% more likely to achieve a PSA90 response within 6 months of treatment initiation (HR, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.35; Discussion: This study leveraged robust information from combined insurance claims and routinely collected EMR data to evaluate PSA90, a clinically relevant biomarker of treatment response, among Black patients with mCSPC. These results are among the first in this understudied patient population and suggest that a deeper and earlier PSA response achieved with apalutamide relative to abiraterone acetate can extend to Black patients in a real-world US clinical setting. Conclusion: Black patients treated with apalutamide experienced significantly higher PSA90 response rates than those treated with abiraterone acetate, suggesting possible clinical benefits from early treatment response in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.