ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Expanding the role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A multicenter study on uncommon peritoneal malignancies.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become an established treatment for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal, ovarian, and gastric cancers, as well as for certain primary peritoneal tumors such as pseudomyxoma peritonei. However, evidence supporting its role in other uncommon indications remains limited, largely due to the rarity and heterogeneity of these malignancies and the absence of standardized treatment protocols. Understanding the potential survival benefit and safety profile of CRS + HIPEC in these contexts may help refine patient selection and guide clinical decision-making.
aimTo evaluate surgical and oncologic outcomes, particularly overall survival (OS), in this heterogeneous patient population and assess perioperative morbidity and mortality to better define the safety profile of this aggressive multimodal strategy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from five tertiary cancer centers on patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC between January 2004 and December 2021 for PM from uncommon histologies, defined as any primary tumor other than colorectal, gastric, or ovarian carcinomas, pseudomyxoma peritonei, or malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Baseline characteristics, operative details, complications (graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification), and survival outcomes were analyzed. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The discriminatory ability and overall fit of the final model were assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and likelihood ratio test, respectively.
resultsA total of 60 CRS + HIPEC procedures were performed in 60 patients (mean age = 58.5 years, 78.3% female). The most frequent primary tumors were uterine (35%) and breast cancer (20%). Median operative time was 405 minutes, and 75% of patients required perioperative transfusions. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 21.6% of patients, and 90-day mortality was 1.6%. Median OS for the entire cohort was 28 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that breast cancer patients achieved the longest survival (median OS = 75 months) compared with uterine cancer (32 months) and other primaries (17 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed tumor origin as the strongest independent predictor of OS (C-index = 0.81; likelihood ratio test = 40.07;
conclusionOur findings suggest that CRS + HIPEC can be performed safely in highly selected patients with PM from uncommon primary tumors, achieving meaningful long-term survival in subsets such as breast and uterine cancers. Tumor biology, rather than clinical factors, emerged as the key determinant of survival. Given the rarity and heterogeneity of these malignancies, collaborative multicenter efforts and prospective registries are essential to establish standardized selection criteria and optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.