Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41480160›Full record

ReviewBone reports2026

Interdisciplinarity of secondary osteons: relevance of bioarchaeological and palaeontological research in biomedical cortical bone histology studies.

Justyna J Miszkiewicz, Karen M Cooke, Holly E Reid, Julien Louys

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justyna J MiszkiewiczSchool of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Karen M CookeSchool of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Holly E ReidSchool of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Julien LouysAustralian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary osteons are fundamental products of bone metabolic processes. They accumulate, crowd, and superimpose over themselves over the lifespan of the individual and capture significant biological, environmental, and even social information. They are crucial in biomedical research as a reflection of bone health and disease. Because bone preserves after death, secondary osteons offer a window into past human and animal lives. They are arguably one of very few biological traits that have been examined across multiple disciplines that work with modern and ancient samples. Here, we review articles indexed in PubMed that examine secondary osteons but span beyond biomedicine, such as palaeontology and bioarchaeology. We aim to identify commonalities and differences across these disciplines to highlight potential for exchange of existing complementary data and future collaborative avenues. We find that 9 % of articles reporting new secondary osteon data (622 obtained) represent archaeological or fossil material. The key shared positive outcome across these disciplines has been data and histology images that provide insights into age, sex, behaviour, species discrimination, and anatomical variation. The main limitations of using ancient samples are the unknown and thus estimated demographic information of human and animal remains studied, and artifacts of taphonomy and bioerosion seen in bone histology that originate from post-mortem, burial, and diagenetic processes, which are not present in biomedical samples. We conclude that a histological analysis of secondary osteons can be a versatile tool in different fields of bone research and encourage transdisciplinary collaboration to better improve our knowledge of bone remodelling processes.

Indexed as

Haversian systemsHistomorphologyHistomorphometryInterdisciplinarity

Identifiers

PMID41480160
PMCPMC12754215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.