ArticleNew microbes and new infections2026
Improving antibiotic prescribing in LMICs: Insights from an outpatient clinic in Pakistan.
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most human antibiotic use occurs in outpatient care and is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Although sales statistics suggest that high-income countries consume more antibiotics overall, the steepest growth is seen in low- and middle-income countries. Sales data - incomplete and non-transparent - reveal little about prescriptions to individual patients. Detailed, clinic-level data are essential for identifying targets for stewardship.We investigated antibiotic use and prescription appropriateness in an outpatient clinic in Pakistan - a country with some of the world's highest reported AMR prevalences. Methods: Patients attending an outpatient clinic near Lahore were interviewed immediately after their clinic visit and again one month later. Clinical data were collected through patient interviews, and antibiotic prescriptions were extracted from patient records. Results: Of the 983 participants, 398 (40.5 %) were prescribed antibiotics at the primary visits. Metronidazole was the single most common agent, followed by first-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and amoxicillin-clavulanate; phenoxymethylpenicillin and amoxicillin were only minimally prescribed. One-third of prescriptions (33.2 %) were combination regimens, 90.2 % of which included metronidazole. Guideline-concordant first- or second-line choices accounted for only 23.4 % of prescriptions.Of all patients, 493 (50.2 %) attended a one-month control visit. Of these, 233 (47.3 %) also saw a practitioner during the visit; 73 of them (31.3 %) were prescribed antibiotics. Conclusions: Antibiotic prescribing was excessive and discordant with recommended first-line therapies, favouring broad-spectrum agents and combination treatments - practices likely influenced by the negligible time available per patient. Our findings highlight the need to adapt antimicrobial stewardship interventions to limited-resource contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.