ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Integrative linkage and recombination analysis of 25 X-STRs across 7 linkage groups using pedigree-based and SNP-based strategies.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: X-chromosomal short tandem repeats (X-STRs) are valuable genetic markers in forensic science for resolving complex kinship scenarios. However, the linkage relationship and recombination of X-STRs remain poorly characterized. Methods: Based on high-density SNP data with relatively low mutation rates, we developed a pedigree-based method to analyze the recombination relationships between these X-STR linkage groups (LGs). We used X-STRs data from 66 two-generation families and X-SNPs data from 602 X-chromosomal SNP trios from the 1000 Genomes Project. We investigated the linkage relationships among 25 X-STR loci, grouped into seven LGs, including three identified regions (Xp21.1, Xq21.31, Xq23) and four Argus X-12 (Xp22.2, Xq12, Xq26, Xq28), provided broader coverage linkage groups of X-STR. Results: We found strong intra-group linkage (Maximum logarithm of odds (MLOD) > 5) and near independence between groups (MLOD <1). Estimated recombination rates of X-STR data ranged from 0.0000 to 0.0487 within LGs, and from 0.1561 to 0.4133 between LGs, while the recombination fraction between the 7 linkage groups occurred in approximately 50% of informative meioses. LD decay analysis showed that Discussion: The family-based methods with X-SNP provide a more robust framework for evaluating X-STR linkage with the advantage of a relatively low mutation rate, high density and phased, particularly for newly developed loci lacking extensive haplotype databases. Conclusion: These findings contribute to a more precise understanding of X-STR inheritance and enhance their reliability in forensic kinship analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.