ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2025
Re-Epithelialization Comparison Between Topical Administration of 1% Feracrylum and Silver Sulfadiazine in the Treatment of Deep Dermal Burns in Wistar Rats.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gold standard burn dressing silver sulfadiazine (SSD) is widely used, but many disadvantages have been reported. An alternative is 1% feracrylum (1FA), a hemostatic agent that provides antibacterial activity, and wound improvement has been clinically proven. This study aimed to investigate the effect of 1FA in re-epithelization in burn wound management. This experimental study used 27 healthy male Wistar rats. All received inhalation anesthesia, then were prepared for deep burn injury using a metal plate. The animals were treated with either 1FA, SSD, or moist saline gauze (control group). The wound was measured with a two-ruler method on days 0, 5, 10 and 14. On day 14, quantitative and qualitative assessments of re-epithelialization were made. The percentage of wound healing was significantly better in the 1FA group compared to the control and SSD groups (p <0.001 on day 5; p<0.001 on day 10, and p <0.001 on day 14). The histopathology evaluation revealed that the epithelial thickness was significantly greater in the 1FA group compared to the control and SSD groups (p<0.001). The granulation tissue thickness was greater in the SSD group compared to the control and 1FA groups (p<0.001). The neovascularization in the 1FA group was more mature compared to the control and SSD groups (p<0.001). In this animal study, 1FA administration showed improved wound healing and re-epithelialization of the skin after deep dermal burns. These findings may lead to a new therapeutic approach for burn wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41480126PMC12755383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.