ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Application of key link nursing based on feedforward control theory in the emergency rescue of multiple trauma patients.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the application effect of key link nursing, which is based on feedforward control theory, in the rescue of emergency patients with multiple injuries. Methods: A total of 120 patients with multiple injuries admitted to the emergency department of Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital from August 2022 to February 2025 were included in the study and grouped according to different emergency modes: 46 patients with multiple injuries were included in the conventional group (conventional emergency care), and 74 patients were included in the feedforward control group (nursing intervention in key links on the basis of feedforward control theory). The emergency time, treatment effect, patient family nursing satisfaction, complication rate and trauma severity of the feedforward control group and the conventional group were compared. Results: Compared with those in the conventional group, the time to establish intravenous access, the time to complete systemic examination, the time to stay in the emergency department, the time from the emergency department to the operating room, the incidence rates of MODS and DIC, the referral rate and the incidence of complications in the feedforward control group were significantly lower. Compared with those of the conventional group, the process handling, communication explanation, rescue skills, prepreparation score, nursing satisfaction score and scores of each dimension of the SF-36 significantly increased ( Conclusion: Key link nursing based on feedforward control theory can improve the rescue success rate of emergency patients with multiple injuries, shorten the rescue time, improve the severity of patients' injuries, reduce the occurrence of complications, effectively improve management satisfaction, and improve patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.