ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Engaging rural communities in Bangladesh to address antimicrobial resistance via the community dialogue approach: a protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To effectively tackle antibiotic resistance (ABR) a One Health approach is required, focusing on the human, animal and environmental sectors together, and that public education and engagement programs must be part of the overall approach. However, there has been limited research on such programs in low-/middle-income countries (LMICs). Here we describe our plans to evaluate a community-engagement program, known as the community dialogue approach, that takes a One Health approach to tackling ABR in rural communities in Bangladesh, and involves community-led and community-based education and discussion forums. Members of our team previously developed this approach and used it to address other health issues in other LMIC contexts, while our team has previously adapted it for this topic and setting. Methods: We will use a pragmatic, non-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized, controlled trial to primarily evaluate whether the intervention can improve (1) the level of correct and appropriate knowledge about antibiotics, ABR, and antibiotic usage from a One Health perspective, (2) levels of awareness about the existence of antibiotics and ABR, and (3) the relative frequency of self-reported and observable indicators of best practices related to antibiotic usage. Within Cumilla district, we will randomize 50 clusters of villages in a 1:1 ratio. In intervention community clusters trained community volunteers will deliver a set of 11 health education and discussion forums across a 12-month period, while control community clusters will receive no inputs. We will collect outcomes at baseline (pre-randomization) and endline (following the final community dialogue) via two repeated cross-sectional household surveys (each aiming to survey 2,200 participants across all clusters). We will also conduct nested process evaluation and costing studies. Discussion: Community engagement approaches have successfully addressed other health issues in low resource settings, but there is limited evidence on using community engagement approaches to address ABR in low resource contexts, particularly in Bangladesh. We will closely involve the Bangladeshi health system in this research to ensure feasibility and facilitate scale-up via an embedded approach. Clinical trial registration: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN93756764, identifier ISRCTN93756764.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.