Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41480066›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Challenges in implementing preventive treatment for latent tuberculosis infection: a narrative review from provider and demand-side perspectives.

Yuxiao Ling, Songhua Chen, Yu Zhang, Qian Wu, Ke Yang, Dan Luo, Yang Li, Yiqing Zhou, Wei Wang, Bin Chen and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuxiao LingSchool of Public Health, Health Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Songhua ChenDepartment of Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qian WuDepartment of Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ke YangDepartment of Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Dan LuoSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yang LiSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yiqing ZhouSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Bin ChenDepartment of Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jianmin JiangDepartment of Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preventive treatment is an important measure to interrupt the development of tuberculosis (TB) in people with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), which is among the key elements of TB prevention and control in the future. However, the implementation of preventive treatments has been affected by various factors and has fallen far short of expectations. Therefore, this study aims to systematically identify barriers to initiating and implementing LTBI preventive treatment globally from both demand-side and supply-side perspectives, providing targeted evidence to advance the End TB Strategy. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for articles related to preventive treatments. All included articles were peer-reviewed English-language articles published between January 1, 2010, and August 31, 2024. The barriers affecting the initiation and implementation of preventive treatment were extracted from eligible articles and summarized from the two perspectives of supply side and demand side. Results: Low levels of awareness, concerns about adverse effects, longer treatment periods, and uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of treatment may influence the acceptance of preventive treatment. Furthermore, inadequate knowledge and experience of healthcare workers, limited human and material resources, and low policy priorities may partially hinder the implementation of preventive treatments. Conclusion: Multidimensional interventions need to be developed to improve acceptance and adherence to preventive treatment and accelerate the implementation. This not only provides direction for future research but also provides a reference basis for clinical practice and policy development to accelerate the process of eliminating TB.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelLatent TuberculosisHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansadherencechallengeslatent tuberculosis infectionpreventive treatmentreview

Identifiers

PMID41480066
PMCPMC12753996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.