ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Mapping the prevalence of molecular markers of
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review (PROSPERO-ID CRD42024593923) spanning the years 2014-2025, complementing existing data from WWARN, MalariaGEN Pf7, and the WHO Malaria Threats Map. This integrated dataset, comprising 3,806 distinct molecular epidemiology surveys and 182,071 genotyped samples, was harmonized using a standardized data schema. We applied a spatial-temporal Gaussian process model to estimate the continuous prevalence of WHO Findings: ART-R increases were driven by distinct emergences of Interpretation: The rapid and multicentric expansion of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.