Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41480022›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

The Effect of AI on the Radiologist Workforce: A Task-Based Analysis.

Curtis P Langlotz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Curtis P LanglotzProfessor of Radiology, Medicine, and Biomedical Data Science, Senior Associate Vice Provost for Research, Senior Fellow, Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-8972-8051

Funding

RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effect of AI algorithms on the radiology workforce has been a subject of commentary and controversy. There is now sufficient published evidence to support a quantitative task-based analysis to predict these effects. Purpose: To construct a quantitative, task-based model to predict the effect of AI on the radiology workforce using the best available evidence. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the literature to establish the tasks on which radiologists spend their time. We then developed categories of AI applications that could affect these tasks. We used published evidence to estimate the effect of each AI application on each radiology task using a 5-year time horizon. When published evidence was unavailable, we used our own judgment. Results: The model projects a 33% reduction in hours worked by radiologists in 5 years, with a range of 14% to 49%. The main effects are due to radiology report drafting for all modalities and study delegation for radiography and mammography. Conclusion: AI applications likely will cause a significant decrease in radiologist hours worked.. Given the relatively static radiology workforce and the continued growth in imaging volumes, radiologist job loss is unlikely for the foreseeable future.

Identifiers

PMID41480022
PMCPMC12755265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.