ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2025
Coronary drug-coated balloons: Current evidence and emerging trends.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary and peripheral stenoses has advanced rapidly over the past three decades, driven by a series of innovative techniques since the introduction of the first balloon angioplasty. Significant progress in stent technology, beginning with bare-metal stents and followed by drug-eluting stents, has expanded the scope for successful revascularisation in complex lesions. However, challenges such as late stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis (ISR) persist. Thus, further improvement in PCI techniques and devices is essential to achieve better patient outcomes. In recent years, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising alternative designed to overcome the limitations associated with drug-eluting stents, including the risks of late stent thrombosis, ISR, and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Several DCBs have been evaluated for both coronary and peripheral lesions, showing encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies. DCBs have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of ISR and have shown potential in other clinical scenarios, such as small-vessel disease and diffuse lesions. In this review, we present the underlying technology, mechanisms of action, key preclinical findings, emerging clinical indications, recent trial outcomes, and future perspectives of DCBs as they continue to define their role in PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.