Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Music engagement, metacognitions, and performance outcomes: an empirical investigation among Chinese advanced music students.

Jieru Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jieru ZhangHenan Conservatoire, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the role of engagement and metacognitive factors in predicting performance outcomes among advanced Chinese music students. Drawing on theoretical frameworks in metacognition and self-regulation, the research tests a set of hypotheses examining both direct and mediated pathways linking students' engagement with performance success. Building on the metacognitive model of Wells and Matthews and the theory of self-regulated learning, this study conceptualizes three dimensions of metacognitive functioning-cognitive confidence, need to control thoughts, and positive beliefs about worry-as cognitive, regulatory, and motivational mediators that explain how engagement translates into performance achievement. Methods: The study sample consisted of advanced music students from various conservatories in China. Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.0, while structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted with SmartPLS 4. Results: Findings support the direct influence of music students' engagement on performance outcomes, highlighting the importance of proactive involvement in practice. Cognitive confidence is shown to mediate this relationship positively, while the need to control thoughts has a minor mediated effect, and positive beliefs about worry demonstrate a negligible impact. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the multifaceted role of metacognition in music education, suggesting that metacognitive skills such as planning, monitoring, and self-regulation significantly enhance learning processes and performance. Practical implications include recommendations for music educators to incorporate metacognitive training into their curricula, fostering students' cognitive awareness and adaptive learning strategies. This study contributes to the growing field of metacognitive research in music education, offering insights into optimizing performance outcomes through targeted engagement and reflective practice.

Indexed as

metacognitionmusic educationmusic engagementperformance outcomesself-regulation

Identifiers

PMID41479986
PMCPMC12753482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.