Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479982›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Understanding of ironic and literal utterances in 4-9-year-old typically developing children: role of age, narrative skills, emotion comprehension and executive functions.

Ekaterina Oshchepkova, Natalia Kartushina, Maria Kovyazina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ekaterina OshchepkovaFaculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia KartushinaInstitute of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maria KovyazinaFaculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language comprehension is essential to communication, yet understanding varies between literal meaning and verbal irony. While children grasp words' surface meanings, interpreting verbal irony requires them to consider context and infer the speaker's true intent, revealing a deeper layer of meaning. What factors contribute to this complex skill? The current study examined the impact of sex, narrative skills, executive functions (working memory and inhibitory control), theory of mind and emotion comprehension, while controlling for age, on understanding of literal statements and verbal irony in 267 typically developing 4-9-year old children (130 boys). To assess children's irony comprehension, we presented them with cartoon scenarios and asked to choose an emoji to indicate whether a parent's reaction was literal or ironic. A full-null model approach was used to examine the impact of children's cognitive, executive, emotional, and narrative skills on their irony understanding, where the full contained our factors of interest and the null contained only age and sex. The results indicated that age was the only factor related to literal meaning comprehension. In contrast, both age and working memory were significantly related to irony understanding. These findings can be used as a foundation for developing training to enhance non-literal language and pragmatic skills in children.

Indexed as

executive functionsironyirony understandingpragmatic developmentpreschool agetest of emotion comprehension

Identifiers

PMID41479982
PMCPMC12753986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.