Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479981›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Varieties of imagery and perception: the structure of task differences.

Anna Maria Berardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anna Maria BerardiCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study assessed the dimensions and factors underlying visual mental imagery abilities in young healthy participants. A second purpose was to compare the underlying pattern of factors and dimensions in imagery with those in the corresponding perception tasks. Methods: We administered 15 tasks to 32 participants, assessing a wide range of imagery abilities, including imagery for faces, common objects, colors, words, mental rotation, scanning, image maintenance, auditory imagery, and tactile imagery. Response times and error rates were correlated for the imagery and for the perception tasks separately. The matrices were then analyzed using nonmetric multidimensional scaling and principal components analysis. Results: All analyses indicated the presence of two main clusters, one that appeared to correspond to tasks that draw on the object-properties "ventral system" and one that appeared to correspond to tasks that draw on the spatial-properties "dorsal system." Discussion: These results indicate a common segregation of the two major processing systems in visual imagery and visual perception.

Indexed as

dorsal vs. ventral streamshealthyhumanmental imageryvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID41479981
PMCPMC12755107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.