Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479955›Full record

ArticleMetabolism open2026

Machine learning-based binary classification of elevated HbA1c (≥6.5 %) for risk assessment.

Dler Hussein Kadir, Azhin Mohammed Khudhur, Hewir Abdulqadir Khidir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolism open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dler Hussein KadirDepartment of Statistics and Informatics, College of Administration and Economics, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Azhin Mohammed KhudhurDepartment of Statistics and Informatics, College of Administration and Economics, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Hewir Abdulqadir KhidirDepartment of Statistics and Informatics, College of Administration and Economics, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: One of the most important biomarkers for evaluating long-term glycemic management and estimating the risk of diabetes is glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Early risk assessment and intervention techniques can be improved by identifying important clinical and demographic variables. Through the integration of clinical indicators (lipid profiles, albumin, and liver enzymes) and demographic characteristics (age, gender), this study seeks to create a comprehensive HbA1c prediction model. Study design: To find the most important factors, logistic regression was used to evaluate 482 cases using a stepwise selection process. Results: With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.797, the final model had strong predictive ability. Age (OR = 1.085, p < 0.001), glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) (OR = 1.011, p = 0.0127), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (OR = 0.969, p = 0.017), VitaminD3 (OR = 1.023, p = 0.014), and very low-density lipoprotein (VDL) (OR = 1.016, p = 0.018) were all significant predictors. Conclusions: The greatest predictor was age, which was positively correlated with elevated HbA1c levels, whereas HDL had a protective impact. The addition of VitaminD3, VDL, and GPT implies that indicators of liver and metabolic function have a major role in the variability of HbA1c. These results demonstrate how normal clinical and demographic data may be incorporated into predictive models for early diabetes risk assessment, enabling more individualized medical care and bettering patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AUCClinical predictorsDiabetes risk assessmentHbA1cLogistic regressionPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41479955
PMCPMC12754236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.