ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Efficacy and safety of plastic and metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound guided-biliary drainage in elderly patients.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stent selection in elderly biliary drainage: A pragmatic guide from benign to malignant.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (BD) is becoming more common as a secondary drainage method in cases of difficult endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In a recent study, EUS-BD reportedly demonstrated similar safety between elderly patients and all other patients. However, the appropriate stent for placement in elderly patients is unknown.
aimTo clarify whether a metallic stent (MS) or a plastic stent (PS) is suitable when performing EUS-BD in elderly patients.
methodsThis was a multicenter retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS-BD between March 2005 and February 2025. The data of patients aged 70 years or older who underwent successful EUS-BD were analyzed, and the long-term outcomes of patients treated with an MS (MS group) and those treated with a PS (PS group) were compared.
resultsNinety-four patients underwent successful EUS-BD, of whom 64 were aged 70 years or older. The PS group included 51 patients, and the MS group included 13 patients. The time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) was not significantly different between the PS group and the MS group (6-month recurrent biliary obstruction rate 50.8%
conclusionA PS might be sufficient for performing EUS-BD in elderly patients aged 70 years or older with benign biliary disease because it is easily replaced. However, an MS might be more effective for elderly individuals with malignant biliary obstruction because of the expectation of a longer TRBO and a reduced need for stent replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.