Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479932›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Mastering the third space: Innovations in intramural endoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal disorders.

Gabriela Restrepo-Rodas, John Rodriguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriela Restrepo-RodasGeneral Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 00000, United Arab Emirates.
John RodriguezGeneral Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 00000, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Third-space endoscopy, also known as intramural surgery, represents a major evolution in minimally invasive gastrointestinal interventions. While natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery provided early conceptual groundwork, third-space endoscopy builds upon it by maintaining interventions within the submucosal layer, offering improved precision and reduced risk. The creation of a controlled submucosal working space enables precise therapeutic interventions while potentially reducing the morbidity associated with traditional surgical approaches. Among its most impactful applications are the peroral endoscopic myotomy techniques, including cricopharyngeal, esophageal, gastric, and Zenker's myotomies. These procedures have redefined the management of cricopharyngeal bar, achalasia, gastroparesis, and Zenker's diverticulum, respectively. These techniques offer durable symptom relief with reduced recovery times. Over the past five years, refinements in technique, advancements in instrumentation, technology, and improved patient selection have expanded indications and enhanced safety. However, challenges remain, including the limited standardization and accessibility to specialized training. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the evolution, technical refinements, and clinical outcomes of third-space endoscopy, with a focus on its expanding role in foregut surgery. By consolidating current evidence and highlighting future directions, we aim to provide a critical perspective on the impact of intramural surgery and its potential to further transform the management of complex gastrointestinal disorders.

Indexed as

CricopharyngealEsophagealGastricThird-space endoscopyZenker

Identifiers

PMID41479932
PMCPMC12754254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.