ArticleFrontiers in systems biology2025
Neural networks and foundation models: two strategies for EEG-to-fMRI prediction.
Article in Frontiers in systems biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) are two widely used neuroimaging techniques, with complementary strengths and weaknesses. Predicting fMRI activity from EEG activity could give us the best of both worlds, and open new horizons for neuroscience research and neurotechnology applications. Here, we formulate this prediction objective both as a classification task (predicting whether the fMRI signal increases or decreases) and a regression task (predicting the value of this signal). We follow two distinct strategies: training classical machine learning and deep learning models (including MLP, CNN, RNN, and transformer) on an EEG-fMRI dataset, or leveraging the capabilities of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models. We show that predicting fMRI activity from EEG activity is possible for the brain regions defined by the Harvard-Oxford cortical atlas, in the context of subjects performing a neurofeedback task. Interestingly, both strategies yield promising results, possibly highlighting two complementary paths for our prediction objective. Furthermore, a Chain-of-Thought approach demonstrates that LLMs can infer the cognitive functions associated with EEG data, and subsequently predict the fMRI data from these cognitive functions. The natural combination of the two strategies, i.e., fine-tuning an LLM on an EEG-fMRI dataset, is not straightforward and would certainly require further study. These findings could provide important insights for enhancing neural interfaces and advancing toward a multimodal foundation model for neuroscience, integrating EEG, fMRI, and possibly other neuroimaging modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.