Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479845›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems biology2025

Neural networks and foundation models: two strategies for EEG-to-fMRI prediction.

Maël Donoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maël DonosoOuroboros Neurotechnologies, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) are two widely used neuroimaging techniques, with complementary strengths and weaknesses. Predicting fMRI activity from EEG activity could give us the best of both worlds, and open new horizons for neuroscience research and neurotechnology applications. Here, we formulate this prediction objective both as a classification task (predicting whether the fMRI signal increases or decreases) and a regression task (predicting the value of this signal). We follow two distinct strategies: training classical machine learning and deep learning models (including MLP, CNN, RNN, and transformer) on an EEG-fMRI dataset, or leveraging the capabilities of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models. We show that predicting fMRI activity from EEG activity is possible for the brain regions defined by the Harvard-Oxford cortical atlas, in the context of subjects performing a neurofeedback task. Interestingly, both strategies yield promising results, possibly highlighting two complementary paths for our prediction objective. Furthermore, a Chain-of-Thought approach demonstrates that LLMs can infer the cognitive functions associated with EEG data, and subsequently predict the fMRI data from these cognitive functions. The natural combination of the two strategies, i.e., fine-tuning an LLM on an EEG-fMRI dataset, is not straightforward and would certainly require further study. These findings could provide important insights for enhancing neural interfaces and advancing toward a multimodal foundation model for neuroscience, integrating EEG, fMRI, and possibly other neuroimaging modalities.

Indexed as

chain of thoughtEEGEEG-to-fMRI predictionfMRIfoundation modelLLMneurofeedbackneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID41479845
PMCPMC12753390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.