ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2025
Donor-derived cell-free DNA and its utility in kidney transplantation: A myth or a reality.
Review in World journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal allograft rejection and its detection are challenging problems for transplant clinicians. Transplant physicians rely on serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, donor-specific antibodies, and graft biopsy to detect rejection. The sensitivity and specificity in these blood and urine tests are low, and the invasiveness of graft biopsy has led transplant clinicians to seek alternative diagnostic tools. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a fragment of DNA released from cell death due to necrosis and apoptosis. Donor-derived cfDNA (dd-cfDNA) has been proposed as a potential non-invasive biomarker for detecting rejection. However, one must interpret it cautiously in conditions such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, delayed graft function, BK virus nephropathy, post-kidney biopsy, and dual kidney transplantation, which may cause dd-cfDNA elevation. There is a lack of standardized cutoff values for diagnosing various types of rejections. Low specificity, higher cost, and lack of universal availability are the multiple obstacles to using this tool. There is a need to establish clinical guidelines for its future utility in early rejection detection, graft surveillance, and tailoring of immunosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.