Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479790›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Dose-escalated icotinib in frail, older adults patients with

Junhui Wang, Jian Wang, Jianxin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junhui WangDepartment of Radiation. The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiaxing Second Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
Jianxin ChenDepartment of Education, International Word. The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic potential of dose-escalated EGFR-TKIs in high-risk Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort analysis included 17 treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced/metastatic Results: The study cohort, characterized by high-risk features including a median age of 73 years, poor performance status (ECOG PS 2 in 88.2% of patients), baseline brain metastases (41.2%), and multi-organ involvement (≥2 metastatic sites in 47.1%), demonstrated clinically significant antitumor activity. The objective response rate (ORR) was 52.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.8%-77.0%), while the disease control rate (DCR) reached 94.1% (95% CI: 71.3%-99.9%). Survival analyses revealed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 months (95% CI: 2.63-26.58) and a median overall survival (OS) of 30.9 months (95% CI: 20.63-41.18). Notably, molecular stratification identified a significant survival advantage for Conclusion: Double-dose icotinib shows robust efficacy and manageable toxicity in high-risk older adults patients, with clinically meaningful PFS/OS. The unexpected OS benefit in L858R mutants warrants validation but suggests a dose-dependent advantage. Metastatic burden remains a key prognostic factor. These findings support dose escalation as a viable strategy for frail populations with limited access to next-generation TKIs.

Indexed as

dose escalationEGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomaicotinibolder adults patientsreal-world study

Identifiers

PMID41479790
PMCPMC12754169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.