Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479786›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Deep learning-based dose prediction for prostate cancer with empty bladder protocol: a framework for efficient and personalized radiotherapy planning.

Byongsu Choi, Deepak K Shrestha, Albert Attia, Brad J Stish, James Leenstra, Jean Claude Rwigema, Jiansen Ma, Sung Uk Lee, Jong Hwi Jeong, Jongeun Kim and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Byongsu Choi *Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Deepak K Shrestha *Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Albert AttiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Brad J StishDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
James LeenstraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Northfield, MN, United States.
Jean Claude RwigemaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
Jiansen MaDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Sung Uk LeeProton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hwi JeongProton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.
Jongeun KimProton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.
JeongHeon KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Chris BeltranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Justin C ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is a cornerstone in the management of localized and locally advanced prostate cancer, traditionally delivered with a full bladder (FB) protocol to reduce radiation exposure to surrounding organs. However, consistent bladder filling is difficult to maintain, leading to workflow delays, anatomical inconsistencies, and variable toxicity outcomes. Recent evidence, including the ongoing RELIEF trial at Mayo Clinic, suggests that an empty bladder (EB) protocol provides comparable toxicity outcomes to FB while improving patient comfort and treatment consistency. To address the increased anatomical variability associated with EB protocols, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based dose prediction model tailored to EB patients. A conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) with a modified 3D U-Net architecture was trained on 90 FB cases and fine-tuned on 20 EB cases stratified into stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Model performance was evaluated against clinical manual plans using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics. The EB Fine-tuning model(SBRT/IMRT) achieved superior accuracy compared with the general FB-trained model, with an average MAPE of 3.53 ± 0.40% versus 4.87 ± 0.86%. DVH analyses demonstrated improved agreement with manual plans for planning target volumes and organs at risk, with discrepancies consistently within 2.5 Gy or 3%. These results demonstrate that fine-tuning with EB-specific data enhances prediction accuracy and clinical relevance of the DL-based model. The proposed framework supports efficient EB treatment planning, provides reference dose distributions for quality assurance, and offers educational value to clinicians adopting EB protocols. By combining automation with clinical applicability, this approach facilitates broader adoption of EB radiotherapy in prostate cancer while improving workflow reproducibility and patient-centered care.

Indexed as

deep learningdose predictionempty bladderparticle therapyprostateradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID41479786
PMCPMC12753453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.