ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Intraoperative endoscopy: A controversial tool or a necessity in modern esophagogastric surgery?
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy has become increasingly popular with the recent advancements in technology and the increase of minimally invasive techniques. UGI endoscopy is indicated for diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic purposes and significantly influences the management of patients with a spectrum of foregut diseases, including esophageal and gastric malignancies, achalasia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. There is growing evidence that intraoperative UGI endoscopy can be a useful adjunct and a powerful tool to enhance tumor localization, offering a direct evaluation of the surgical reconstruction and identifying potential sources of postoperative complications. However, its widespread utilization has been limited by concerns over cost, accessibility, and sufficient training and expertise. The aim of the current study was to review and elaborate on the available literature while presenting our experience in an academic institution specializing in esophagogastric surgery with intraoperative UGI endoscopy. We focused on the indications, added benefits, and related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.