ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure as a first-line treatment for post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks: A paradigm shift in management.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-esophagectomy anastomotic leak (AL) is a severe complication following esophagectomy, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and a significant risk of mortality. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EndoVac) has emerged as a promising first-line treatment, offering a highly effective approach for managing post-esophagectomy AL. EndoVac therapy utilizes continuous negative pressure within the esophageal lumen or mediastinal cavity, promoting granulation tissue formation, accelerating wound healing, and enhancing AL closure rates. Compared to stenting, EndoVac provides distinct advantages, including superior adaptability to varying leak sizes and locations, enhanced secretion drainage, and lower rates of reintervention. Clinical studies have demonstrated higher success rates, decreased post-intervention complications, and shorter hospital stays. Despite its advantages, challenges persist in patient selection, procedural expertise, and accessibility. EndoVac application requires experienced endoscopic teams and multidisciplinary expertise, which is best achieved in high-volume centers with specialized care. Variability in EndoVac protocols necessitate further refinement and standardization to optimize treatment outcomes. The integration of EndoVac into standardized treatment guidelines holds promise for improving patient outcomes and redefining the management approach for this challenging postoperative complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.