ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Intestinal ultrasound for monitoring postoperative Crohn's disease: A systematic review and clinical implications.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intestinal Ultrasound-Guided Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative recurrence is common in Crohn's disease (CD), with endoscopic lesions in a majority of patients by 12 months after surgery. Ileocolonoscopy is the reference standard but is invasive and poorly suited to frequent surveillance. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) - including small intestine contrast ultrasound and contrast enhanced ultrasound - is a repeatable, noninvasive alternative.
aimTo summarize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of IUS for detecting postoperative recurrence in CD.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE through June 2025 for original English-language studies evaluating IUS against clinical or endoscopic outcomes in postoperative CD. This scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. After screening 259 unique records, 41 full texts were assessed and 20 studies were included.
resultsBowel wall thickness thresholds of ≥ 5 mm at the neo-terminal ileum predict endoscopic recurrence with sensitivities 81%-94% and specificities 86%-100%; lower cutoffs at the anastomosis (≥ 3-3.5 mm) also carry risk (data from singlecenter cohorts). Dualsite assessment (neo-terminal ileum + ileocolonic anastomosis) improves performance. Adding Doppler hyperemia or mesenteric lymphadenopathy increases accuracy; combining bowel wall thickness ≥ 3 mm with fecal calprotectin ≥ 50 μg/g yields high specificity (approximately 93%-100%) with a negative predictive value of nearly 95% when both are negative. Contrast enhanced ultrasound-based composite scores reach approximately 98% diagnostic accuracy in prospective cohorts. Small intestine contrast ultrasound shows similarly strong early diagnostic performance - for example, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve up to 0.95 when using ileocolonic anastomosis wall thickness ≥ 3 mm to 3.5 mm plus lesion length, with 82%-94% sensitivity and > 90% specificity reported even within 7 days post-resection. Overall, IUS shows moderate agreement with endoscopy (
conclusionIUS can be integrated into postoperative surveillance algorithms - particularly within the first year - and can reduce routine endoscopy in selected patients. Research priorities include standardized thresholds and composite scoring, consensus training/competency, and multicenter validation including artificial intelligenceassisted interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.