Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479687›Full record

ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2025

The diagnostic value of transcranial sonography in Swedish parkinsonism patients: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.

M Stiehm, C Nilsson, Ö Skogar, U Walter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M StiehmDept. of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö/Lund, Sweden.
C NilssonDept. of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö/Lund, Sweden.
Ö SkogarDept. of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö/Lund, Sweden.
U WalterDept. of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although transcranial sonography (TCS) assessing hyperechogenic substantia nigra (SN+) as biomarker for Parkinsońs disease (PD) has been introduced elsewhere, the clinical relevance and accuracy in a Swedish population is still unknown. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 74 patients with predominantly early-stage parkinsonism at first visit who had been examined by TCS from 2013 to 2017 to determine the SN+ biomarker status in relation to PD, atypical parkinsonian disorders (APS), essential tremor (ET) and vascular/secondary/ unspecified parkinsonism, with the aim of long-term follow-up to confirm the clinical diagnosis. The cut-off value for SN+ was regarded as the 90 % percentile of SN echogenicity in a local healthy cohort (here, 0.23 cm Results: In 2024, the mean follow-up time was 95 months. Three patients (4 %) without transcranial bone were excluded. SN+ was found in 38/51 patients with finally diagnosed PD and 4/20 patients with other final clinical diagnoses (p < 0.001). Sensitivity was moderate (75 %) whereas specificity and the positive predictive value were higher (80 % and 90 %, respectively). SN area measurements (most abnormal side) were significantly different in PD-patients compared to non-PD patients (n = 63; 0.28 ± 0.09 [95 % CI: 0.25-0.30] cm Conclusion: After a follow-up of up to 8 years, to maximize diagnostic certainty, our findings support the use of TCS as a valuable add-on tool in PD diagnostics in a Swedish patient population, already in the early stage of disease but not for screening.

Indexed as

Essential tremorHyperechogenicityMovement disordersParkinsonismParkinsońs diseaseSubstantia nigraTranscranial sonographyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41479687
PMCPMC12754217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.